To Paradise

To Paradise

  • Downloads:1765
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2022-01-20 10:16:05
  • Update Date:2025-09-23
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Hanya Yanagihara
  • ISBN:1529077478
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

From the author of the classic A Little Life, a bold, brilliant novel spanning three centuries and three different versions of the American experiment, about lovers, family, loss and the elusive promise of utopia。

In an alternate version of 1893 America, New York is part of the Free States, where people may live and love whomever they please (or so it seems)。 The fragile young scion of a distinguished family resists betrothal to a worthy suitor, drawn to a charming music teacher of no means。 In a 1993 Manhattan besieged by the AIDS epidemic, a young Hawaiian man lives with his much older, wealthier partner, hiding his troubled childhood and the fate of his father。 And in 2093, in a world riven by plagues and governed by totalitarian rule, a powerful scientist’s damaged granddaughter tries to navigate life without him—and solve the mystery of her husband’s disappearances。

These three sections are joined in an enthralling and ingenious symphony, as recurring notes and themes deepen and enrich one another: A townhouse in Washington Square Park in Greenwich Village; illness, and treatments that come at a terrible cost; wealth and squalor; the weak and the strong; race; the definition of family, and of nationhood; the dangerous righteousness of the powerful, and of revolutionaries; the longing to find a place in an earthly paradise, and the gradual realization that it can’t exist。 What unites not just the characters, but these Americas, are their reckonings with the qualities that make us human: Fear。 Love。 Shame。 Need。 Loneliness。

To Paradise is a fin de siècle novel of marvellous literary effect, but above all it is a work of emotional genius。 The great power of this remarkable novel is driven by Yanagihara’s understanding of the aching desire to protect those we love – partners, lovers, children, friends, family and even our fellow citizens – and the pain that ensues when we cannot。

Download

Reviews

Natalie

Dnf at 15%。 Wanted to like it because of ALL, but not for me。

Hugo Gerbich Pais

The first man will never have to work in his life, in fact he is so wealthy he can leave everything to chase love。 The second man is a broke paralegal who fled from his homeland and is now dating his wealthy boss。 The third is a successful virologist, whose very success has trapped him instead of freeing him。“To Paradise” is Hanya Yanagihara’s first work since her incredibly successful 2015 release “A Little Life,” shortlisted for the Man Booker Prize。 “A Little Life,” released Jan。 11, is a nov The first man will never have to work in his life, in fact he is so wealthy he can leave everything to chase love。 The second man is a broke paralegal who fled from his homeland and is now dating his wealthy boss。 The third is a successful virologist, whose very success has trapped him instead of freeing him。“To Paradise” is Hanya Yanagihara’s first work since her incredibly successful 2015 release “A Little Life,” shortlisted for the Man Booker Prize。 “A Little Life,” released Jan。 11, is a novel on par with if not better than her previous release。 To appreciate this book, I had to trust Yanagihara — its 700 pages are split across three sections, each set 100 years apart from each other。 Each story is wildly different, but all are narrated by a gay man and set in the same large home in New York City 。 I admit, this terrified me。 It seemed far too ambitious to keep me invested enough to finish this novel。 However, my fears were unwarranted。 By the end of my time with “To Paradise”, the novel felt like an old friend。 I was accustomed to Yanagihara’s gentle narrative style, and, even if the characters and time periods changed, they never felt alien or disorienting to me as a reader。 I was constantly guided by the work’s unifying theme: regret。 Across all three stories, we encounter characters filled with regret, wishing that they had done more for their loved ones。 This is one of Yanagihara’s particular strengths —transcribing onto the page the things we are too afraid to say out loud。 Yanagihara’s authorial talent is also demonstrated by her beautiful use of time distortion。 Through letters, daydreams and changing narrative perspectives, the reader darts across time in this novel, allowing Yanagihara to masterfully control the novel’s pacing。 I was completely at her whim and often struggled to put the novel down, reading furiously just to return to the time period that I was most invested in。There is a fine line between truly disliking a character and hating the way they put themselves in harm’s way, and Yanagihara walks it well。 For the most part, I was fond of all of the protagonists, and when I felt disappointed or frustrated at them, it was clearly the author’s intent。 However, at times I felt their development was rushed, and character complexity was lost — no doubt a consequence of having to cram five protagonists into one novel。 I also appreciated the way that Yanagihara was able to provoke reflection on key contemporary socio-political issues。 The first section is set in 1893, in a world where marriage equality exists and women have been full members of society for a hundred years already — while people of color are still marginalized and not treated equally。 In the second section, set in 1993, we witness the AIDS pandemic, and how classism shaped the experiences of AIDS victims。 Finally, the third section is set in a totalitarian America in 2093 ravaged by plague, warning us about how swifty the decline into dictatorship can take place and how dire the consequences are once it arrives。 This novel is long but never felt like a chore to read, a testament to Yanagihara’s genius。 It is paced beautifully, and I was able to escape to worlds that were foreign enough to be fascinating, yet familiar enough to force me to reflect on my own life。 “To Paradise” made me consider the consequences of our pursuit of happiness on our relationships, our family and our future。 。。。more

Lindsay

Wow! Very different from A Little Life, but just remarkable。 I wasn’t sure how I’d do with the third part, being post-apocalyptic NYC amidst pandemics。 But it was transformative。 She is such a powerful writer and it tickles me how divisive she is for people!

Kelly Ge

3。5 (rounded up)。**will add longer review

Lucy Olivia

Wahhhh, this book hurt。 This is the first Hanya book I’ve ever read, but I am aware of her other books and how tragic A Little Life is。 This was such an epic that took you from high to low back to high and then BAM, you’re crying。 I want to keep spoilers to an absolute minimum, so all I will say it; if you want 815 pages of pure devastation and a journey through the centuries, read the book。 5*

Readelf

Wow! There's just so much I want to discuss and unpack about this book。 Lengthy review later Wow! There's just so much I want to discuss and unpack about this book。 Lengthy review later 。。。more

Richa Bhattarai

It was as wide & engrossing & addictive as I had expected it to be。 I will recommend it, and recommend it wholeheartedly。 Yet I for one do not understand why these novellas must be mushed together into one。 I relate to the central theme of finding your version of heaven - be it love or freedom or simply a dream。 And also that all the stories follow this theme。 But why then do they feel arbitrary and superfluous, and worst of all, rambling in parts? I cannot explain the story, either - there are It was as wide & engrossing & addictive as I had expected it to be。 I will recommend it, and recommend it wholeheartedly。 Yet I for one do not understand why these novellas must be mushed together into one。 I relate to the central theme of finding your version of heaven - be it love or freedom or simply a dream。 And also that all the stories follow this theme。 But why then do they feel arbitrary and superfluous, and worst of all, rambling in parts? I cannot explain the story, either - there are multiple stories across centuries, based in New York and Hawaii。 All the characters are struggling。 Mostly for identity and affection and a purpose, but everyone for a sense of freedom, of one’s essence, of meaning for life。 For a paradise。 The writing is par excellent as always, the canvas so grand, many lines so moving and beautiful and standing tall like masterpieces。 But when I come to the third novel I worry for the writer, for her intense obsession with sadism, masochism, self-punishment and flagellation。 I must be allowed to write whatever I like, she has said, and indeed she must, but this time I was stung by the amount of general hatred and misanthrope tendencies。 I could discern a perverse love (not sympathy, but almost a greedy savoring) for human suffering and sorrow。The Dystopian worldview was surprisingly badly done - it is like tired bits of Hunger Games, or Echo Boy, or just some YA setting you have read many, many times。 I would give her a 5 just for her magical writing if this were the only book of hers。 But the human mind compares, and so I give this a 3。5。 I will think of this book again as I think about Hanya at least once a day, and I will note other thoughts that come to me。 。。。more

Jessica B

Ambitious, confusing, mesmerizing。Three books for the price of one。

Bipin

"Lipo-Wao-Nahele" is one of the best thing ive read in such a long time! thanks Hanya for making this gem of a novel and blessing us in the beginning of the year love you! "Lipo-Wao-Nahele" is one of the best thing ive read in such a long time! thanks Hanya for making this gem of a novel and blessing us in the beginning of the year love you! 。。。more

Thor Reimann

Well, that's quite the heart warmer。 Woah。Ok so I have many thoughts。1。 This books is SO ambitious。 Not sure what to make of the three overlapping storylines, especially given that one (the last one) seems to be so heavily favored not only in page count, but also emotional depth and impact。 Or is that just the fact thiat it is pandemic related, so it feels closer to home? But often I felt myself questioning if these stories were in the same universe, or not, or where they were located。 there are Well, that's quite the heart warmer。 Woah。Ok so I have many thoughts。1。 This books is SO ambitious。 Not sure what to make of the three overlapping storylines, especially given that one (the last one) seems to be so heavily favored not only in page count, but also emotional depth and impact。 Or is that just the fact thiat it is pandemic related, so it feels closer to home? But often I felt myself questioning if these stories were in the same universe, or not, or where they were located。 there are cross-references here and there to a cool effect, but other than an exercise in the multiverse (which Im annoyed that now anytime someone tries to reference other dimensions, it sounds like Marvel fan-behavior LOL), not quite sure what it brings。 That regardless of the circumstances of our lives, we are the same people underneath? I guess I just feel like after the final story, the first two feel thrown away。2。 I love miss Yanagihara。 She is the first author that I have like deliberately read multiples of their works because I was so hooked on their writing。 But GIRL。 Can you PLEASE write a narrative that is not about gay men going through hell?!?!? The way she treats her characters is with such a lack of empathy and just like oh my god they are all just pained and tragic creatures and I want SOME moments of happiness。 3。 this whole "to paradise" bit is so freaking existential。 The whole point is that paradise doesn't exist。 Which, like, sure。 But, also, is this what society needs to hear right now ! LOL this book made me SPIRAL not only about like pandemic stuff, but climate change, love, loneliness, and so many other ways。 This book is not quite as hard hitting as A Little Life (cried 3x at ALL, not once at TP), but it is just as soul-crushing。4。 IMO, This book needed to be shorter。 Sorry。 No reason for 700 pages。 Getting through the first two stories, and even parts of the third were PAINFUL。That's really a summation of my thoughts。 Overall, still quite the feat。 Glad I read it。 Great book。 Depressing AF。 But that's Hanya。4/5; great concept, in execution felt a little unnecessarily long and un-even in importance (purpose of first two books felt a little lost by the end)PS I really really want to know what happens to the characters at end of book 1 and 3 and I know the whole point is that we don't know but GOD like I NEED to KNOW!!! Little Charlie !!!! Has my heart。 。。。more

Christine Liu

To Paradise is a mosaic of stories, a pastiche of voices and novels that have come before viewed through a kaleidoscope that examines the idea of what it means to be American — where we came from, how we got here, what we could have been, and what might lie ahead。 But although the subject of these three stories is America, the scaffold upon which they’re built is, interestingly, a British one。Book I, Washington Square is a reimagining of the Henry James novella by the same title — and it’s worth To Paradise is a mosaic of stories, a pastiche of voices and novels that have come before viewed through a kaleidoscope that examines the idea of what it means to be American — where we came from, how we got here, what we could have been, and what might lie ahead。 But although the subject of these three stories is America, the scaffold upon which they’re built is, interestingly, a British one。Book I, Washington Square is a reimagining of the Henry James novella by the same title — and it’s worth noting that although James was born an American, he became an expatriate and saw himself as an English writer。 In this section, which is set in an alternate, un-united America of the 1890’s, there’s a young man, David Bingham, heir to a family of old and distinguished New York wealth, and he's in the midst of navigating an arranged marriage to a slightly less wealthy New England widower named Charles when he begins to fall in love instead with Edward, a penniless music teacher who might be a con man。Book II is called Lipo-wao-nahele and takes us a hundred years forward, to another alternate America and another David in a story that will be immediately recognizable to fans of Virginia Woolf。 A single evening on which David and his much older boyfriend Charles are hosting a dinner party stretches on for what feels like a small eternity as we are caught up in David’s many stream-of-consciousness meditations on his life as one of their friends is preparing to die, all the while he avoids a letter from his estranged and ailing father, who is descended from the former ruling family of Hawaii。 The second half of this part is told from the perspective of the father, also named David, or Kawika in its Hawaiian form, and I personally found this half to be the most compelling section of the book。Book III, Zone Eight leaps another hundred years forward, this time to a dystopian America that can only be described as Orwellian。 Through chapters that alternate between the first person perspective of a woman named Charlie and the earlier letters from a different Charles that gradually reveal the state of the country and how things got to where they are。Although these are three disparate stories, there are elements that echo throughout — the repetition of Davids, Charleses, and Edwards in various permutations, the basic plot of James’s Washington Square which pops up in various shades and forms in each iteration, and the Washington Square building itself which anchors each story in an ever-changing New York。 There are also consistent themes that emerge — colonization, the relationships that exist between parents and children, between government and governed, weak and strong, loved and unloved。 The picture of America that emerges from this triptych is a bleak and pessimistic one for sure: things were not great to start with, and they get a lot worse — which, let’s face it, is a valid argument。This is a difficult book to rate because while it is objectively well-written, and Hanya Yanagihara is objective a gifted writer, this is not a book that I want to read again。 It’s so suffused with misery and despair, with relationships characterized by hollowness and disappointment, and characters who are resigned to their fundamental unlovableness。 The biggest plot points of each of the three stories leaves you hanging with no resolution, and the takeaway from this book as a whole seems to be that to go in pursuit of a nonexistent paradise is a fool’s errand because it doesn’t exist and can only lead to suffering。 。。。more

Gregory Duke

The definition of mediocrity。 I read through the entirety of the first book, and it is not particularly playful in its language, its concepts are shallow, its semi-cliffhanger ending leaves me apathetic, and it bores me。 The beginning of the second section seems worse, so there is absolutely no reason why I should waste any of my valuable reading time on this。 Sad that Yanagihara can't pull out another The People in the Trees。 Sidenote: it mildly annoys me that all that all press and comments on The definition of mediocrity。 I read through the entirety of the first book, and it is not particularly playful in its language, its concepts are shallow, its semi-cliffhanger ending leaves me apathetic, and it bores me。 The beginning of the second section seems worse, so there is absolutely no reason why I should waste any of my valuable reading time on this。 Sad that Yanagihara can't pull out another The People in the Trees。 Sidenote: it mildly annoys me that all that all press and comments on Goodreads are about A little Life。 I understand why that is, but then there is so much written about how people want this new novel to make them sob or whatever other histrionics people desire, and so many publications are stating how To Paradise is so unlike its predecessor。。。 yeah, it really shouldn't shouldn't shocking。 The People in the Trees to A Little Life transition was also clearly a severe one。 For starters, a clear transition from subtlety to melodrama。 But whatever。 No one really seems to tall about her debut, even though it's her best book。 C'est la vie。 。。。more

Sam Goldberg

a 3。5/5 probably more accurately reflects my feelings。 i wanted to love this book。 but unfortunately, i could not in the way that i wanted。 at about the halfway mark part three begins, this portion being more of a proper novel and definitely gets 4 stars, but the first two just didn’t do it for me。

Wilson

I genuinely don’t know how I feel about this book。

Brett Glasscock

I'll say it, this book sucked。 It probably doesn't actually deserve one star, but its getting one star out of pure spite, out of just how insufferable the reading experience was。 In lieu of an actual review, here is a bulleted list of my grievances:-This is not a novel。 This is three separate (half finished) books bound together。 The only ties are that all the characters have the same name, and a house on Washington Square。 The three sections all take place in separate universes。 They have liter I'll say it, this book sucked。 It probably doesn't actually deserve one star, but its getting one star out of pure spite, out of just how insufferable the reading experience was。 In lieu of an actual review, here is a bulleted list of my grievances:-This is not a novel。 This is three separate (half finished) books bound together。 The only ties are that all the characters have the same name, and a house on Washington Square。 The three sections all take place in separate universes。 They have literally nothing to do with one another。 Reading this book is like reading an author's collected works cover to cover。-Hanya Yanagihara's maximalist style, which was endearing and effective, in "A Little Life" is just absolute fucking bloat in "To Paradise。" So much scenic description。 So much didactic philosophizing。 -In spite of the previous point, "To Paradise" has none of the depth of character and emotion that made "A Little Life" work。 Like not even a fraction of it。 Everyone is just so distant。-The third section, the longest, takes place in a bleak dystopia and is narrated by a (purposefully) affectless protagonist who has no real drives, ambitions, wants etc。 Which is such a bizarre artistic choice。 It just makes the section feel so unengaging, like there's literally nothing exciting in it。 It has almost no build。 Just ~350 pages of bleh。-Not a single plot resolves in this book。 It's not that all of them are open ended endings, it's that all of the sections just cut off right at the climax。 And that is, seemingly, supposed to be justified by ending each section with the chintzy refrain "to paradise。"-Why, Hanya Yanagihara, did you INVENT new forms of anti-Blackness and settler colonial violence in the alternate history/utopia section ????? It didn't have anything to do with the plot or characters in the section。 It was just like "oh yeah the people could get gay married but don't worry they still hated non-white people :)"。 This was a particularly bizarre choice given how much of the novel centered around questions of Hawaiian independence。 Okay that's all that I can think of at the moment。 One of my least favorite reading experiences in recent memory 。。。more

Flexnib

OMG。

Andy

I don't think I am going to pick up another Yanagihara, it would take up too much on my soul。 And health。Definitely not as good as A Little Life, and even that isn't a book I am too keen on。 The characters in this book I just couldn't relate to and the plot was just too boring to focus on。 The different 'segments' didn't deliver the way other authors do it, and it just dragged on and on。 As soon as I finished this book, I felt way better knowing I was done。Sorry Yanagihara, these emotional tortu I don't think I am going to pick up another Yanagihara, it would take up too much on my soul。 And health。Definitely not as good as A Little Life, and even that isn't a book I am too keen on。 The characters in this book I just couldn't relate to and the plot was just too boring to focus on。 The different 'segments' didn't deliver the way other authors do it, and it just dragged on and on。 As soon as I finished this book, I felt way better knowing I was done。Sorry Yanagihara, these emotional torture rides just ain't for me。 。。。more

Marchpane

Big Book Energy Hanya Yanagihara could have written A Little Life 2。0 but instead she said: ‘Let us write THREE books and smoosh them together, and let them be speculative and set at 100 year intervals, and at first glance they will have nothing in common, well except for the character names, which shalt be the same in each story to confuse and irritate everyone。’ This is a swaggering, bolshy, beast of a novel that doesn’t care what you want it to be。To Paradise is capacious, covering love and Big Book Energy Hanya Yanagihara could have written A Little Life 2。0 but instead she said: ‘Let us write THREE books and smoosh them together, and let them be speculative and set at 100 year intervals, and at first glance they will have nothing in common, well except for the character names, which shalt be the same in each story to confuse and irritate everyone。’ This is a swaggering, bolshy, beast of a novel that doesn’t care what you want it to be。To Paradise is capacious, covering love and loss, hope and delusion, prejudice and privilege, societal progress and regress, and so, so much。 But mostly it is about choices, the decisions, actions, and inaction that determine the course of a person’s life or a country’s history。 It’s about the shame, regret, the leaps of faith that attend these choices。 At a page-by-page story level, it is compelling, engrossing reading。In the first two sections, set in 1893 and 1993, Yanagihara toys with American history like a cat with yarn—upending the mainstream morality and politics of the times in ways big and small。 I would not call this ‘alternate history’ because that genre typically deals in hypotheticals, a game of ‘if this, then what?’ that she refuses to play。 Instead, it is a demonstration that the way things turn out are not inevitable or even likely—the timeline we are living is just one of many possibilities。The third section, perhaps unfairly, will garner the most attention。 Set in the mid-to-late 21st century, it imagines a totalitarian government during a time of rolling pandemics, through the eyes of two brilliantly rendered and complex characters。 Some of the worldbuilding is a bit clunky but there are also a lot of great details (New Britain = New Coke?)Many people will say these are three self-contained stories that did not need to be stitched together like this。 Yes and no。 Book I is a charming queer retelling of Henry James’ Washington Square。 Book II is relationship-centric lit-fic about power imbalances, from the personal to the imperial, with a moving denouement。 Book III is a smart, emotionally and morally complex, (some will say didactic, but if a global crisis is not the time for didacticism, when is?) dystopia。 Separately, they all work。But combining them, ah, this is the bravura。 Reading Book III after the first two gives it an inflection that completely changes the tone from grim to buoyant, even hopeful: remember it doesn’t have to turn out this way。 Yanagihara is not giving us some slippery slope cautionary tale, she’s showing us one possible timeline。 A timeline determined by choices, which are manifold, complex and iterative, their outcomes not at all easily predicted。 Is To Paradise a novel destined to have a long or a short half-life? I really don’t know。 Despite its heft, it could yet prove to be the latter: a firecracker, albeit one with a 700-page fuse, that blazes bright in its topical moment and drifts away on the smoke。 It seems almost too flashy to endure。 Either way, what a dazzler! 。。。more

Astrid

ich muss erstmal alle Gedanken sortieren。

amira

washington square - 5/5lipo-wao-nahele - 4/5zone eight - 3/5overall im putting 3

Victor Sonkin

Shouldn't be saying much — for us, it's a work in progress。 Deeply touched and honored that the whole Russian team of translators and publishers of "A Little Life" was mentioned in the acknowledgments。 Stay tuned。 Shouldn't be saying much — for us, it's a work in progress。 Deeply touched and honored that the whole Russian team of translators and publishers of "A Little Life" was mentioned in the acknowledgments。 Stay tuned。 。。。more

Zoe Giles

3。5 stars lots of thoughts, much-mixed feelings, review coming when I can sort my way through themSo I'm going to start by saying I have never read A Little Life (because I am scared) but reading this one has made me far more likely to pick up A Little Life because there was no denying Hanya's talent for writing and especially her talent for writing characters that get you emotionally invested。 However。。。 I have super mixed feelings about this oneFirst off this is a very large book, but I have r 3。5 stars lots of thoughts, much-mixed feelings, review coming when I can sort my way through themSo I'm going to start by saying I have never read A Little Life (because I am scared) but reading this one has made me far more likely to pick up A Little Life because there was no denying Hanya's talent for writing and especially her talent for writing characters that get you emotionally invested。 However。。。 I have super mixed feelings about this oneFirst off this is a very large book, but I have read large books before that I didn't even notice was so big because I was so absorbed。 This was not the case with this one。 It really felt like hard work to get through this, but at the same time I was never tempted to stop and I never had any desire to pick up another book and was always intrigued and somewhat invested in the characters, if not the storyline (mixed feeling number 1)This book was split into 3 parts。 In part 1 we're set in a slightly alternate version of American history following a young man from a wealthy family who falls in love with someone his family does not approve of。 In book 2 we're set in a slightly alternate 80s/90s America during an illness akin to the AIDs epidemic。 In book 3 we're in a future America that is characterised by pandemics, climate change, and increasing totalitarianism。 The only thing that apparently links the 3 stories is the characters shared names as well as occasional easter eggs throughout。I think my first issue is I struggled to understand what the point of a lot of this was。 I felt like Hanya had try to weave in so many different themes and issues to explore that they kind of ended up getting lost in the multitude of words。 I felt like there was probably an intended deeper meaning that was just getting bogged down with how much was being covered。 My favourite part of the book were the more personal character stories rather than the bigger moralistic themes。 This was the part that I felt invested in (particularly in Book 1 and Book 3) and that made me want to keep reading, which is also why I feel more mentally ready to pick up A Little Life) On that note, if people are picking this up because they want to be emotionally destroyed again, this is probably not the one for you。 While there were sad and difficult scenes throughout due to the nature of the plots, I wouldn't say this was a particularly emotionally read and I did not cry 。。。more

Emily

As if January isn't already bad enough。。。 now my most anticipated book of the year has let me down。 This was an auto buy for me as I LOVED A little Life and The People In The Trees。 But this review isn't about those books, and I don't want it to come across that I didn't like To Paradise because it wasn't ALL。 I would have disliked this book anyway。 Firstly I'd like to mention the only positive thought I had about this book。 the writing。 It's no secret that Hanya Yanagihara has a magic touch whe As if January isn't already bad enough。。。 now my most anticipated book of the year has let me down。 This was an auto buy for me as I LOVED A little Life and The People In The Trees。 But this review isn't about those books, and I don't want it to come across that I didn't like To Paradise because it wasn't ALL。 I would have disliked this book anyway。 Firstly I'd like to mention the only positive thought I had about this book。 the writing。 It's no secret that Hanya Yanagihara has a magic touch when it comes to prose, but even that couldn't save this。 They were lovely and all, but I did get a bit of a pretentious vibe when I was reading。 Long and complex sentences, for no reason it seems, other than to confuse the reader。 The MOST upsetting thing for me was the lack of depth and substance in the characters。 They were so boring and flat and I didn't care for them one bit。 I also think that because this was split into 3 books, each character didn't get enough time to shine。 This kind of leads nicely to the fact that everyone in this book has the same bloody name。 I could be dumb, and it may be done for a specific reason, but for me it made my reading experience confusing。。。 there are other names apart from Edward & David。 That's enough from me。 This book did NOT have good vibes, and I can't believe I wasted so much time on it。 My advice, save your money and read a washing machine manual instead :) 。。。more

Venus Robbie

This book is terrible。 Terrible writing, terrible structure, terrible terrible terrible。 I got through the first section, a tiresome Henry James pastiche, but I was already gritting my teeth。 The amount of abstract nouns were wearing me down。 Tried to engage with the rest。 Tried my best, as I know each section stands alone。 I couldn’t。 Do you know why? Because this book is TERRIBLE。

Karola Dahl

Das paradiesische Leben in New York, beschrieben in 3 JahrhundertenIn drei Buchteilen mit großen Sprüngen in der Geschichte geht es Homosexualität, Herkunft, Rassismus, Identität, Kolonisation und schließlich um Pandemie, Flüchtlinge, Zukunftsvision。Das New York 1893 gehört zu den ‚Freistaaten‘ im Osten der USA mit David, um die 30 Jahre alt, zwischen Liebe und Vernunft, zwischen einer arrangierten ‚Vernunft-Ehe‘ mit dem reichen, älteren Charles oder der Liebesehe mit dem armen, verruchten Edwar Das paradiesische Leben in New York, beschrieben in 3 JahrhundertenIn drei Buchteilen mit großen Sprüngen in der Geschichte geht es Homosexualität, Herkunft, Rassismus, Identität, Kolonisation und schließlich um Pandemie, Flüchtlinge, Zukunftsvision。Das New York 1893 gehört zu den ‚Freistaaten‘ im Osten der USA mit David, um die 30 Jahre alt, zwischen Liebe und Vernunft, zwischen einer arrangierten ‚Vernunft-Ehe‘ mit dem reichen, älteren Charles oder der Liebesehe mit dem armen, verruchten Edward, der ihm in Kalifornien das Paradies verspricht。Im New York von 1993 arbeitet ein anderer David, königlich-hawaiianischer Abstammung, als Anwaltsgehilfe。 Er ist der Geliebte eines 30 Jahre älteren (anderen) Charles, von Beruf Anwalt。 In den Reihen all seiner schwulen Freunde grassiert Aids, wie die Abschiedsparty für den (nur) an Krebs erkrankten Peter ergibt。 In einem Brief an David von seinem sonderbaren Vater geht es auch um Amerika als, das Land, das die Sünde im Herzen trägt‘, während ‚Lipo-wao-nahele‘ auf Hawaii dessen trügerisches Paradies darstellt。Das New York im Jahre 2093 ist aufgeteilt in Zonen, mit Lebensmitteln rationiert und dem Internet gelöscht。 In diesem Polizeistaat überwachen Fliegen entlang dem Washington Square die Mimik der Leute, die bei allzu großer Hitze nur in Kühlanzügen überleben können。 Großvater Charles, der Virologe und Politikberater, wollte für seine Enkelin Charlie eine bessere Welt entwickeln, doch hier kein Paradies erschuf。 。。。more

Sean Bloom

It’d hurt to DNF this one, but by 200, I didn’t feel anything about it。

Jonathan Hawpe

Yanagihara interrogates the American experiment with this deeply thoughtful and painful multi-threaded epic about the imperfect structures we create to hold and shape our human relationships: romantic, family, law, nation, etc。 Three different time periods, three different versions of America, like a multiversal Tolstoy novel。 Think of Powers' The Overstory or Mitchell's Cloud Atlas crossed with classic social novels like Middlemarch or Age Of Innocence。 Yanagihara interrogates the American experiment with this deeply thoughtful and painful multi-threaded epic about the imperfect structures we create to hold and shape our human relationships: romantic, family, law, nation, etc。 Three different time periods, three different versions of America, like a multiversal Tolstoy novel。 Think of Powers' The Overstory or Mitchell's Cloud Atlas crossed with classic social novels like Middlemarch or Age Of Innocence。 。。。more

Linfa

This could have just been the third part and it would have been great。

Pvfrederick

Not a book to read during a pandemic。

Angel

oof。 just finished this and honestly, i'm not sure what to think。 skip you don't want *mild* spoilers about the format and themes of the book!to begin。 the story is not "a little life" and it shares very little in common with that novel。 having enjoyed yanagihara's previous novel is no indication of whether it not you'll enjoy this book。"to paradise" is certainly an ambitious novel, formatted as a triptych of stories that are somewhat connected by common themes, names, and strangely, butlers。 i oof。 just finished this and honestly, i'm not sure what to think。 skip you don't want *mild* spoilers about the format and themes of the book!to begin。 the story is not "a little life" and it shares very little in common with that novel。 having enjoyed yanagihara's previous novel is no indication of whether it not you'll enjoy this book。"to paradise" is certainly an ambitious novel, formatted as a triptych of stories that are somewhat connected by common themes, names, and strangely, butlers。 i had a hard time understanding why yanagihara decided to reuse the same names over and over in these stories。 ultimately, the execution of this novel fell flat for me。 though i was entertained by books one and three, the flip flopping of perspectives and genres in this novel didn't make sense to me and made it thematically confusing。 i didn't connect as deeply to the characters like i had hoped, and the book was way too long。 。。。more